<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Riaanvanwyk.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riaanvanwyk.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riaanvanwyk.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Random rants and raves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:44:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome – First impressions by riaanvanwyk</title>
		<link>http://riaanvanwyk.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome-%e2%80%93-first-impressions/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>riaanvanwyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riaanvanwyk.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Christo on not recommending it for novices - yet.  Having used Chrome a bit more since my post, I also see some things not rendering as they should. One example is searching in your friends list on Facebook. 
I also miss some of my firefox plugins.

One must remember that this new browser is still in beta mode and have been available for less that 48 hours.  I&#039;m also curious to see what the future releases and updates will bring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Christo on not recommending it for novices &#8211; yet.  Having used Chrome a bit more since my post, I also see some things not rendering as they should. One example is searching in your friends list on Facebook.<br />
I also miss some of my firefox plugins.</p>
<p>One must remember that this new browser is still in beta mode and have been available for less that 48 hours.  I&#8217;m also curious to see what the future releases and updates will bring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome – First impressions by Christo</title>
		<link>http://riaanvanwyk.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome-%e2%80%93-first-impressions/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Christo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riaanvanwyk.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Downloaded. Installed. Used. Impressed.

The aspect that impressed most is the speed rendering JavaScript intensive sites like GMail, Youtube and Facebook. GMail and Google Notebook I use on a daily basis and Chrome felt like a desktop tool running these two sites. Especially looking at memory usage, I prefer having Chrome run all day than running Firefox 3.0.1. Don&#039;t even get me started on the memory usage of IE8 Beta 2.

I wish an &quot;Adblock Plus&quot; plugin exists for Chrome.

There are however some sites not rendering correctly in Chrome. I haven&#039;t tried any of the Acid tests in Chrome, but I&#039;m sure the Google engineers will iron out these minor bugs.

As for the Incognito (aka porn) mode. IE8 Beta 2 has a similar feature and I&#039;m yet to be informed on why we need it. Imho.

At the moment I won&#039;t recommend Chrome to novice/inexperienced users, as it&#039;s feature incomplete and has page rendering issues. But I&#039;ll be using it and anxiously awaiting new releases.

C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Downloaded. Installed. Used. Impressed.</p>
<p>The aspect that impressed most is the speed rendering JavaScript intensive sites like GMail, Youtube and Facebook. GMail and Google Notebook I use on a daily basis and Chrome felt like a desktop tool running these two sites. Especially looking at memory usage, I prefer having Chrome run all day than running Firefox 3.0.1. Don&#8217;t even get me started on the memory usage of IE8 Beta 2.</p>
<p>I wish an &#8220;Adblock Plus&#8221; plugin exists for Chrome.</p>
<p>There are however some sites not rendering correctly in Chrome. I haven&#8217;t tried any of the Acid tests in Chrome, but I&#8217;m sure the Google engineers will iron out these minor bugs.</p>
<p>As for the Incognito (aka porn) mode. IE8 Beta 2 has a similar feature and I&#8217;m yet to be informed on why we need it. Imho.</p>
<p>At the moment I won&#8217;t recommend Chrome to novice/inexperienced users, as it&#8217;s feature incomplete and has page rendering issues. But I&#8217;ll be using it and anxiously awaiting new releases.</p>
<p>C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
